| |
The
Campbell Union High School District includes six
current High School sites. Those sites range in age
from over forty years at Del Mar to just over thirty
years at Prospect. CSS Architecture was the original
architect for all current District Sites.
The current sites were built in direct response to
population growth during the 1950’s. That growth
was the result of the baby boom after World War Two
but it was also a result of the rapid growth of the
aerospace and electronics industry in what was to
become Silicon Valley. Our national goal to land
a man on the moon by the end of the 60’s was
a key component in the large corporate relocations
to the area and the almost instant growth in high
tech jobs that resulted. In conjunction with the
developments in the fledgling information industry,
the seeds of Silicon Valley were already in the ground.
The original growth in the
District came and went and in the late 1980’s
school populations were at long-term lows. For
this reason, the District
was not in a position, nor was there a justifiable
need, to perform substantial renovations to the District
sites.
As the 1990’s dawned
it was apparent that facilities required certain
long-term renovations. It also became
clear that another baby boom was coming.
|
|
The LTFIP
is the result of years of research dating back to
1992. At that time the District initiated a Facilities
Needs Assessment. This Assessment attempted to quantify
the deficiencies present in District buildings and
to identify opportunities for expansion, reconfiguration
and renovation of all District facilities.
In 1997, CSS Architecture began expanding
and restructuring the Facilities Assessment in order
to provide a clearer picture of identified needs
to the District and the Community. Our work included
a detailed analysis of the elements included in the
Facilities Assessment coupled with our intimate knowledge
of the District Sites.
Over the following two years CSS developed a number
of documents that translated those needs into a series
of Logical Projects. Our effort included coordination
with the District Facilities Committee and review
of progress documents by each Site at key stages
in their development.
The LTFIP documentation included project lists, project
descriptions and cost models. That documentation
allowed us to structure a Bond Election that was
rooted in actual need and which presented a fixed
and sensible list of projects to the voters. The
clarity that resulted from the work is one of the
key components that led to the success of Measure
C.
The original Facilities Assessment included a large
proportion of components that were requested specifically
by the various site committees. The LTFIP documents
prepared by CSS continued that trend. Almost all
the projects listed in the current Logical Project
Outline and the resulting LTFIP Phase 1 documents
were requested by the individual sites. In some cases,
a project requested by a particular site was such
a good idea that that project was included at all
sites.
Additionally, CSS Architecture has performed substantial
investigations into all aspects of each site, partly
as the result of Design and Project Management efforts
for recent projects and partly as a direct task of
the LTFIP. Our 45-year familiarity with the sites
has allowed us to create a very responsive Program
for implementation.
The Head Start
Because of the foresight and determination
by the District to be responsive to community needs,
much work had already been performed in realizing
the LTFIP prior to passage of Measure C. The early
efforts allowed us to present a proposition to the
voters that was reasonable, informed, and comprehensive.
The voters clearly understood the need and the proposal
and passed measure C.
That foresight
also allowed us to move into the design phase
of several projects very quickly. The result
is that the first Measure C projects are nearly
complete and design efforts are focusing on the
second wave of projects, many of which are substantial
and high profile.
Thanks
The LTFIP represents a
huge effort on the part of the District and its
Consultants to realize the vision of improvement
and enhancement of the educational facility of
the District. But more impotently, it represents
an even higher level of commitment from the Community
and from the Teachers and Students that make
the District what it is.
The District wishes to thank the
Community for their vision in passing Measure C and
in their continued commitment to quality education
in the Campbell Union High School District. Their
support comes not only in the voter booth but in
the long hours and numerous days and weeks that they
spend help their own students, the teachers of their
students and their neighbors realize a better education
for all.
The District also thanks the Students
and Teachers for their continued efforts at making
education succeed and in helping their community
succeed. And we also thank them for their patience
and flexibility while we construct projects throughout
the District. Many have been disrupted for extended
periods while modernizations occur. Many have sustained
impacts to their daily classroom schedules and to
their seasonal routines in support of the Program.
Without your patience and understanding, none of
this would be possible.
Thanks. We hope we can provide
you with even better schools for your futures.
|
|
The LTFIP includes projects at all High
School Sites and represents approximately $ 117,000,000
in construction value.
In general the Program is intended to accomplish the
following:
General Renovations
- Renovate most of the existing facilities in the District
- Improve all classrooms in the District by upgrading
lighting, data and communications systems and replacing
worn finishes and furnishings
- Upgrade or replace heating and ventilation systems
throughout the District to improve performance while
reducing energy use
- Improve the long term viability of all buildings
by replacing roofs, upgrading utility services and
replacing worn system components
- Improve grounds and playfield for better function
and increased safety
- Improve access and circulation to accommodate all
users.
Selected Project Features:
- Construct new Science Wings at three
sites and renovate existing Science Wings at the
remaining two sites
- Provide enlarged and enhanced Libraries at all
sites that feature full media resources
- Renovate Student Services facilities at all sites
to respond to changing needs and services
- Construct a new Continuation Campus to better serve
District students and provide equity for all educational
services
- Enhance Art Education by expanding facilities and
replacing worn features
- Create a District Performing Arts Center
- Improve Food Service options for better health
and faster service.
This list only begins to address the wide range of
project components that will occur throughout the
District.
Many projects have been completed at each of the District
Sites. Through much research both before passage
of Measure C and in conjunction with the District
staff, Site Principals, Planning Review Committees
and Site Focus Committees, we have developed much
of the design basis necessary for completion of the
Program.
Individual projects still require research and design
efforts and these efforts are being pursued at each
Site at the times appropriate to the stage of design.
Funding
Funding for the LTFIP comes from two sources only:
Local Measure C Bond Revenue as approved by the voters
in 1999 and SB50 Bond proceeds approved in the Statewide
School Facilities Bond of 1998.
Funding for LTFIP projects is legally bound to those
projects and cannot be used for any other purpose.
For this reason, no LTFIP resources can be used to
offset current budget cuts initiated by the State
of California.
Current resources have experienced two trends:
Basic resources have decreased due to the State Funding
shortfall of SB50, the Statewide Facilities Bond.
These resources may be replenished of the March 2004
Statewide Bond passes.
Basic resources have also increased through increased
grants on previously allocated State Fund on short
term interest growth on Measure C Fund while held
for active projects.
In general, Program Resources are available as planned
with only minor fluctuations in both usage and growth.
|
|